Track Record

An Air Force Sergeant whose pay had been incorrectly fixed after release, leading to reduced pension. OA filed before the AFT seeking correct fixation and payment of arrears.

A retired Master Warrant Officer challenged incorrect pay fixation that had been affecting his pension for years. The AFT directed correction and payment of all dues.

Ex Warrant Officer whose pay was fixed incorrectly at the time of release, resulting in lower pension. The matter was taken up before the AFT and the correct pay fixation was ordered.

A Junior Warrant Officer filed for correction of pay fixation and recovery of arrears. Multiple representations to authorities had gone unanswered before the matter was escalated to the AFT.

An Honorary Flying Officer who served nearly 39 years in the Air Force was released in Low Medical Category for Primary Hypertension. The RMB had classified it as a lifestyle disorder. The AFT granted disability pension, later upheld by the Delhi High Court.

A Master Warrant Officer with nearly 40 years of service was denied disability pension for Primary Hypertension. The AFT allowed the claim, and when the Union of India challenged it before the Delhi High Court, the order was upheld with compliance directed within 12 weeks.

An ex-Warrant Officer who retired at age 57 after decades of service sought disability pension for Primary Hypertension. The AFT granted pension at 30% (rounded to 50%) from the date of retirement, with arrears and interest. The Delhi High Court upheld the order.

An Honorary Flying Officer with over 35 years of service was released in Low Medical Category for Primary Hypertension. Authorities denied service attribution. The AFT allowed disability pension, and the Delhi High Court dismissed the government's challenge.

An Air Force MWO whose disability claim was disputed by authorities. After filing before the AFT with medical board records and service history, the Tribunal directed appropriate relief.

A retired Sergeant whose disability pension entitlement was in dispute. The matter involved questions of attributability and aggravation during service. The AFT allowed the application.

A Warrant Officer whose service entitlements were not processed correctly despite multiple representations to the Records Office. The AFT directed the authorities to reconsider and pass appropriate orders.